Access Map Pattern Matching for High Performance Data Cache Prefetch

Hardware data prefetching is widely adopted to hide long memory latency. A hardware data prefetcher predicts the memory address that will be accessed in the near future and fetches the data at the predicted address into the cache memory in advance. To detect memory access patterns such as a constant stride, most existing prefetchers use differences between addresses in a sequence of memory accesses. However, prefetching based on the differences often fail to detect memory access patterns when aggressive optimizations are applied. For example, out-of-order execution changes the memory access order. It causes inaccurate prediction because the sequence of memory addresses used to calculate the difference are changed by the optimization. To overcome the problems of existing prefetchers, we propose Access Map Pattern Matching (AMPM). The AMPM prefetcher has two key components: a memory access map and hardware pattern matching logic. The memory access map is a bitmap-like data structure for holding past memory accesses. The AMPM prefetcher divides the memory address space into memory regions of a fixed size. The memory access map is mapped to the memory region. Each entry in the bitmap-like data structure is mapped to each cache line in the region. Once the bitmap is mapped to the memory region, the entry records whether the corresponding line has already been accessed or not. The AMPM prefetcher detects memory access patterns from the bitmap-like data structure that is mapped to the accessed region. The hardware pattern matching logic is used to detect stride access patterns in the memory access map. The result of pattern matching is affected by neither the memory access order nor the instruction addresses because the bitmap-like data structure holds neither the information that reveals the memory access order of past memory accesses nor the instruction addresses. Therefore, the AMPM prefetcher achieves high performance even when such aggressive optimizations are applied. The AMPM prefetcher is evaluated by performing cycle-accurate simulations using the memory-intensive benchmarks in the SPEC CPU2006 and the NAS Parallel Benchmark. In an aggressively optimized environment, the AMPM prefetcher improves prefetch coverage, while the other state-of-the-art prefetcher degrades the prefetch coverage significantly. As a result, the AMPM prefetcher increases IPC by 32.4% compared to state-of-the-art prefetcher. Ishii, Inaba, & Hiraki